The Way I See It Is.....

What do you think...

What X-Factor?
[info]pezzaruss

A simple comment started the ball rolling for this article. "I could have been at home watching the X-factor" was the line that did it. Truthfully though, it was not so much the words, as the rye grin that followed.

The comment came whilst standing in the back room of a local pub in one of the Shires, watching the progression of an open mic night.

A hand full of acts, armed with guitars and the desire to entertain, procured a space on the makeshift stage. Bestowing upon us a mixture of songs, some selected the well known, while others chose from their own writings.

A new face took the platform, almost rigid with fear, but a good adrenaline filled fear. He announced to his audience that this was his first time. Unlike his collaborator, he was unable to hide behind an acoustic guitar. He adopted his first stance with a small barrier of unyielding arms, but as we were to find out, there was no need for this defence. As guitar tones continued to ring out, the newcomers voice started to become stronger. Finally, with confidence growing, he belted out his final song. He’d made it through to the next round…of drinks, that is.

The time came for Landlord and his posse to take the stage. Having been to many a “gig” in the past, it’s a delight to see a group of gents with more skills than some of those I’ve paid to see, purely up there for the fun of it. There were no prima donnas, no hissie fits if something went wrong and no desire to hog the mic.

The next couple of regular acts, calmed things down a little, with acoustic sets. Some familiar sounding tunes to sing along to, all with the flare of that added personal touch.

A tribute to Dire Straits followed; with clean guitar solo’s that made a budding guitarist green with envy.

A younger set powered up by adding a bit of Hendrix to the mix. The recognisable want to get it right was evident in the playing. Fear not, the crowd loved it.

The final group distributed themselves across the stage. Once again, there was to be no disappointments with the blend of their own numbers and some fancy guitaring on a Pink Floyd rendition.

The female from the group was selected to bring the evening to a close.

A fine set of lungs

We departed with the knowledge that we had had a full evening’s worth of entertainment for the cost of a pint or two and a nice pint of real ale or two at that. By tomorrow the stage will return to a dining area, poised for the next venue in three weeks time.

I must now return to the comment at the start of this piece, mainly with regards to the X-factor. Having sat through this mind numbing embarrassment once, a mistake that I do not intend to repeat. I cannot understand why so many people are willing to be parted with their cash, by phoning or texting their vote to a show that, undoubtedly has a pre ordained outcome anyway.

I am told, by those around me, that some of the contestants DO have good voices. Well we can’t all be right, so I have chosen to back down, waiting to see how many of these GOOD singers, those around me buy CDs of.

I know that there’s talent out there, I’ve seen it, in a local pub. So why there’s a need to fabricate and manipulate the general public with this crass excuse for abilities, is beyond me.

Surely talent scouts could source a multitude of un-bridled abilities and make a similar show. One where the outcome might yield a worthwhile artist and that doesn’t just line Mr Cowells pockets.

Tags:
  • Add to Memories

Overweight
[info]pezzaruss
Having read an article about the NHS paying people to lose weight, I feel compelled to have my say. The NHS currently spends over £1 billion a year treating obesity of one form or another. They have come up with a scheme that they believe encourages people to cast off a few pounds to gain a few pounds. Apparently this will reduce the costs for taxpayers in the future, however I’m sure that the monies will be swiftly allocated elsewhere before we see any benefit. The one part of this that I want to focus on is the fact that 40 overweight nurses are taking part to set a healthy example.
The question is, why are nurses overweight in the first place. They are, according to the urban legend, always rushed off their feet and constantly under immense pressure. Barely a moment spare to get any sleep, let alone time for the intake of nourishment.
Before I continue, I want to make a couple of things perfectly clear. Firstly, I think that they all do a great job and unlike with the likes of Gordon “Paymeloads” Ramsay, they really do save lives. Secondly, by overweight, I mean obese, taking the likes of two Arnold Schwarzeneggers to lift them should they fall over.
Having witnessed at first hand the size of some health workers waddling through the corridors of our hospitals, I wonder, surely there should be some sort of basic fitness level to carry out the job. By definition, “Nurse” is a trained person who helps treat the ill, not someone who ignores all the warning signs to become a potential patient.
Do not misunderstand me, there are other areas that need looking at in a fight against obesity. For instance, the fact that over half of advertisements on tv are for junk food must tell us something about our life styles. We all suffer from the temptation to over indulge at times, so I think there is a need for these role models to promote a healthier persona to help steer us in the right direction and lighten the load, pun intended, on the health service .
Tags:
  • Add to Memories

The Mix Up
[info]pezzaruss
A normal, everyday occurrence, you’re round someone’s house and they offer you a drink, a cup of tea or coffee to be precise. Then it dawns you, you’ve been here before, the tea tastes like three day old gravy, whilst the coffee has a striking resemblance to John Innes Potting Compost.  Where does it all go wrong? I have found the same situation is faced at the work place. Some have the inherent skill to brew, whereas others can only make a potion to make your tongue swell and facial muscles contort in rebellion.
Let’s break this down to basics. Starting with water; a cup full each should suffice, this ought not pose too much of a problem, simply boil once, then it’s ready to pour over whatever is your choice of beverage. Next is the milk, just enough to colour the drink to a dark beige colour, there are two schools of thought over whether or not to put the milk in first or after. I’m in the “after” camp, this way you can get the colour just right, or you could have it black. Last up, the tea or coffee, in the case of tea, be it in a bag or loose leaf, this should be left to steep for a couple of minutes for a rich brew, although not left to stew. Whereas the coffee, a spoon of granules in a mug, pour over the boiled water (they say it’s best not to pour boiling water over as this can burn the coffee) and a stir, done, as Gordon Ramsay would say. Of course there’s the addition of sugar for those of you that need it. But that in essence, is it.
If this tutorial isn’t enough for those of you that like pictures, I’m sure that you’ll be able to find a relevant site on the internet. Whichever resource of information you choose, it’s time to do the right thing. I’m not asking for the talents of Messrs Cruise and Brown to whip up a cocktail to delight the palette, but something that’s drinkable at least. Go on try something different.
Tags: ,
  • Add to Memories

Packet In!!
[info]pezzaruss
Imagine if you will, you have just consumed the contents of your favourite box of confectionary, enjoyed every sensational moment of those soft centred chocolates, only to be left with the packaging. At home you would probably just put it into the bin. What about driving through the countryside, what then, simply throw it out the window; then it’s someone else’s problem? It’s alright sitting reading this thinking, that’s not me, I wouldn’t do that, but somebody does. You only have to look at the streets and hedgerows to see the bright blue carrier bags and the discarded pop bottles in full bloom to know what people don’t do.
In today’s technology filled environment, where gadgets like mobile phones are out dated and obsolete within a blink of an eye, we should do something to reduce the burden of excessive waste. Without doubt there is always going to be rubbish, but it’s the kind of discarded material and how we handle it that’s going to matter. With the debate about landfill verses recycle still only in its infancy, I think we should look at the problem from a different perspective. Maybe reduce the amount of packaging to start with.
Many Supermarkets have already introduced schemes where you bring your own carrier bags, however I still think they can be encouraged to do more. Do we really need plastic bags to put our fruit in and meat in plastic trays that we struggle to open, let alone have any hope of biodegrading. Surely there are paper bags that can cope with these tasks?
Indeed, I think paper still has a major roll to play in this demanding, ever increasing packaging market. Now that we have fast growing forests, purely for the production of paper fibre and we can mould the fibres into trays etcetera, there is no reason to substitute short-term food packaging with long life plastic wrappers. Natural fibres will recycle or decompose, with this in mind, I would like to return to that box of chocolates at the beginning of this piece. Although there is no excuse for any form of littering, if the tray was made from paper fibres, it would start to brake down fairly quickly, thus minimising the amount of unsightly refuse stuck in the hedgerows. What more can we ask for…. I’ll have to look into paper tin cans and bottles?
  • Add to Memories

Licence of Choice
[info]pezzaruss
In light of the fact that the TV licence is about to go up by £3 to £142.50 in April, I have turned my focus to the British Broadcasting Corporation. Should we really be paying for its preservation, or has the time come for us to encourage the Beeb to carry some, if not all of the running costs by advertising?
While I whole heartedly agree that it would be a shame to lose such an institution, especially when you consider the generations that have grown up with the BBC, is it not time to push aside fond memories of a bygone era and alter the way the corporation is financed, permitting us to decide where we want to spend our money?
Without any desire to evaluate each and every presentation provided by the BBC, I have little doubt that the majority will come up to the mark; to which many of you must agree, it isn’t the overall quality of program production that’s in question, it’s down to the freedom of choice. At this point, we are duty bound to add some excellent radio stations into the pot, all of which assembles into a respectable package. However, when it’s compared to the likes of Sky, is the value as good? In reality we can pick and choose which channels and services we want to pay for with the likes of Sky and lets face it, they too do have some very good programs on offer. In essence it all boils down to preference; I have heard it said that there is loads of rubbish on Sky, I cannot disagree, but 9 times out of ten it’s on channels with old repeats from the nostalgia years of the BBC. We can however, choose not to watch them, unlike with the Grandfather of terrestrial TV, they just show repeats and promote them as timeless classics.  “Fools and Horses” being a good example, where the Beeb are the horses, leading the way, well fed and pampered and, yes, that makes us the gullible carts being blindly dragged along behind. What? You didn’t really think that I was going to describe us as “fools” did you? Well I chose not too and that’s the point; choice!
To be truly independent the Beeb will begin to bang on about cut backs, but once they have committed themselves to income from advertising, they can then go on to charge us just for what we want to view or listen to. This should guide them to make the right cut backs in the right areas.
I know that it won’t end there, and I have no doubt that this, or any other Government, will want to squeeze from us a licence fee to own a tv receiver, but this should not be in the region of £150.
  • Add to Memories

4 Wheels on My Wagon
[info]pezzaruss
I doubt that many of you are conscious of the fact that we are in dire need of a modern day Pied Piper. We are being infested by a grotesque beast, an augmented rodent brought about by the intervention of man. This, the first of what might be many articles on motoring, is about 4-wheel-drives. What is it about these hideous vehicles that makes an otherwise calm and rational person turn into an egotistical moron. It is for this reason alone, they have successfully taken the mantle from the man in a white van.

Supposedly, due to the fact that they have to purchase greater amounts of fuel to travel the same distances as us lesser mortals, they assume that they own most, if not the entire road. If you are not already embroiled in the situation where you’ve been cut-up by one of them, sit back and watch,  as they bulldoze their way through our highways similar to a scene from Mad Max.

I have observed a secondary effect to driving one of these, gas guzzling, road hogging, monstrosities, other than the enlarged self esteem, is the fact that it obviously affects depth perception. Parking in ridiculous places, wherever they deem necessary and apparently blissfully unaware that no one can pass. Then comes the look of utter contempt when it’s pointed out to them. Double yellow lines, school crossings and the corner of T-junctions, none of which seem to be off limits, when you have a large carbon footprint.

We are facing a new menace, from the mothers whom insist that it’s safer to take their children 200 yards to school in them, to the overweight businessman who can’t be seen without them. If we do nothing to quell the onslaught, our villages and minor roads will suffer with the burden.

Well Hamelin, it’s time to start playing my flute, ignore the tune at your peril. I hereby propose a few solutions; first up, parking. As the brute appears to need two spaces, not including the opening of doors, we should concede and give them two, but only at the far side of any supermarket car park. Further discouragement should be made by minimizing the amount of spaces available, once these are full, they have to move on. Thus enabling normal people, in normal vehicles, to park normally. Under no circumstances should the “brick-shit-houses” on wheels be allowed to park on single carriage roads, failure to comply should result in hefty fines.
Next, as they do cause far more wear to the roads etc, simply double or triple their road tax to an amount that covers all costs.
In the event of a collision with a normal vehicle, the engorged pick-up is obliged pay all costs.
Road humps don’t work either; these have been placed merely for them to bounce over whilst a friend takes a picture for them to keep in their wallet. The closest the majority get to “off-road”. The solution is concrete pillar bottlenecks, these should slow them down and where necessary, close enough apart to prevent them turning into any quiet back streets.

Although I can appreciate that there are exceptions, farmers for instance, require such vehicles to perform certain tasks, but I cannot fathom why there is no form of vetting imposed to deter dim-witted imbeciles ending up behind the wheel of something lethal that they can’t manage. Control or their lack of it, concerns me the most, especially in confined spaces such as car parks. We’re not Americans; our cities are void of wide-open plains for which to roam.

This has turned into a bit of a rant I’m afraid, due to the fact that I cannot see the funny side to what is rapidly becoming a plague. Soon we’ll have to pay the piper.
  • Add to Memories

Put a Sock in it
[info]pezzaruss

I know that it’s been a mystery ever since cavemen first went down to the local stream to wash their favourite leather feet wraps.  Painstakingly pounding them against the rocks  using the latest brand of non-bio washing powder, drying them over open fires, only to find a couple of days later that one had gone missing.

It appears that I too have fallen victim of this phenomenon. A spot check on my sock drawer revealed that from a possible 23 pairs of socks, there were only 7 useable pairs. 15 socks were missing a partner. These are bad statistics in anybody’s book. If you asked anyone that has handled socks after being removed from the feet, the reply is consistently one of denial. I have tried to analyse this through each stage. The first area of suspicion is the linen basket; perhaps the odd sock was left behind, skulking about in the bottom? Not so, I’ve checked, nothing there. Next up the washing machine; is it the soap powder? Doubtful, other items would suffer from any form of corrosion as well. Is it the water? Well I think Noah would have been in some trouble, having taken two of each animal onto his ark, only to find half of them gone 40 days later? Next up, the washing line; surely this is the place that highlights the missing items. Apparently not, the discovery is only made when a selection is made to be worn. At the moment there appears to be no logical solution to the problem.  I am beginning to think that there are greater forces at work here. The theory that washing machine manufacturers are in league with knitwear companies to boost sock sales, I find a little far fetched. How does the machine know to leave the one sock?

Whilst conducting this investigation, I have encountered a possible source or should I say cause to the demise of the pairings. Apparently it has become fashionable to wear odd socks and I have a daughter whose duty it is to be fashionable.A covert extraction took place from the conflict zone of my daughters’ bedroom and two lost souls have been reunited. But this still leaves many unaccounted, for which I will continue the search.

  • Add to Memories

DIY Dentists
[info]pezzaruss

After reading an item in the news just recently, about the rise in people undertaking their own dentistry using household objects, my first reaction was, what did we expect? With treatment in Britain being the most expensive in Europe and a high percentage of Britain's practitioners making our dental treatment private, thus providing less access to NHS care. Despite the governments reforms, many people can no longer afford the imposed bloated prices. Although this did conjure up numerous images of people with minds adrift whilst using contact adhesives, fumbling to replace a filling or grappling with pliers to remove that painful tooth.

In my view, we will in fact be making a large U-turn in attitudes to health in this country. Simply put, if you have the funds, you'll get the treatment or there's always the flight to Poland option. Where will the DIY end, out in the shed with that trusted old Black & Decker sander to remove that unsightly mole?

Tags: ,
  • Add to Memories

The End of Films
[info]pezzaruss
To open this topic, I must confess to be a bit of a film addict. Thus making it hard not to criticise other peoples hard work. An abundance of time, money and effort goes into the production of a film, so why do we suffer at the hands of the writer. Who, no doubt, has pondered over the story line, added the suspense of the who-dunnit, only to plunge to the depths with a cliché conclusion. To give some examples of this I'll submit the following...
"Untraceable" - Although the film clearly has similarities with other thrillers such as The Net, and cringe factor of Saw, the main plot does manage to keep you watching, but then comes the inevitable end sequence. Well we all knew that the FBI agent wasn't going to die. The fact that she failed to asses the situation, took no heed of the large sticker on her windscreen saying, "He's hiding inside",  but continued to let scenario unfold was somewhat deflating. I winced more at the direction the film had taken, rather than the agent's circumstances. Why not write a more plausible ending by killing her off then the rest of her colleagues would come charging in blasting everything in sight, only to find they'd killed the wrong man - result. "Ironman" -  This too starts well, has a good build up with overtones of well placed humour, only to disappoint with a very poor, and dare I say it, very predictable, robot fight scene as a clincher - oh hum. "Hancock" - I was going to leave watching this as I feared full on American cheese, but the film in the main worked well, nothing pushed the boundaries of the mind plot wise, but once again stumbled like Bambie on ice at the end. It just runs out of story, failing to achieve closure, but they did manage to bring out the full cheese board with crackers, but no cigar.
Tags:
  • Add to Memories

TheTruth is out there
[info]pezzaruss
TheTruth is out there
TheTruth is out there,
originally uploaded by pezzaruss.
I find myself compelled to follow up on an earlier item, after years of doubt, I have been enlightened... unlike some other urban legends such as Bigfoot, UFOs, or even the Loch Ness Monster, Roads Gritters really do exist. I have seen one and by the look on other bystanders faces, they were as astonished as me. I had to get photographic evidence to prove it, this was to be told around a camp fire for years to come. Only two days after the snow has gone, they ventured out in the cold for a bit of a drive. I must have blinked though, because I didn't see them actually gritting. Oh well, I can still tick it off in my "I Spy Book of Things You Don't Get to See".
  • Add to Memories

You are viewing [info]pezzaruss's journal